News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Monday, March 14, 2005
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE MONDAY, MARCH 14
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountain region encompassed by the Tenth Federal Reserve District expanded solidly in February and expectations for future factory activity remained very strong.

A summary of the February survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The February manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s web site, http://www.kansascityfed.org

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District expanded solidly in February. The year-over-year production index rose after falling somewhat in January, and expectations for future factory activity remained very strong. Manufacturing price pressures persisted. The year-over-year raw materials and finished goods price indexes were at or near record highs, and firms generally expect price pressures to continue in the months ahead. All of the month-over-month indexes in the survey rose in February, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production rose to 43 in February, after falling from 50 in December to 37 in January (Tables 1 & 2). The small increase was due to improvement at nondurable-goods-producing plants, as the production index for durable-goods-producing firms remained about the same as last month’s high level. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production was well above year-ago levels in most district states.

Other year-over-year indexes of factory activity were somewhat mixed, though generally still quite solid. The capital spending index rose from 20 to 26, and the export orders index rose to 18, its highest reading since 1996. Meanwhile, the overall new orders index was unchanged at 45, and the shipments, employment, and workweek indexes eased slightly. The inventory indexes also fell somewhat after jumping to record levels in January.

The year-over-year price indexes changed only slightly from January’s high levels. The raw materials price index edged up from 81 to 83, its highest reading ever, and the finished goods price index posted a reading of 54 after rising to a record 55 last month. The gap between the two price indexes was narrower in January and February than at any time during 2003 or 2004, although the fact that the gap is still relatively large suggests some firms continue to have difficulties passing price increases on to customers.

Plant managers’ expectations for future factory activity were very high. The six-month-ahead production index edged up to 48. The last time the index exceeded this level was in late 2003. The future new orders and employment indexes also rose. The future shipments, capital spending, and export indexes were virtually unchanged from January but still high by historical standards. The future raw materials price index edged up from 60 to 61, only slightly below its April 2004 peak of 65. Meanwhile, the future finished goods price index rose from 36 to 42, its highest level ever. Although a sizable gap persists between the two future price indexes, the gap is the smallest since late 2003, suggesting that firms may anticipate some increase in pricing power in the months ahead.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, February 2005
  February vs. January
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
February vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
49 33 17 32
63 15 20 43
59 26 11 48
Volume of shipments
46 30 21 25
60 18 18 42
61 23 11 50
Volume of new orders
45 33 19 26
59 23 14 45
57 22 16 41
Backlog of orders
31 41 23 8
47 31 16 31
33 44 15 18
Number of employees
29 55 14 15
41 30 26 15
39 41 16 23
Average employee workweek
23 61 15 8
31 50 16 15
25 56 15 10
Prices received for finished product
21 74 1 20
61 27 7 54
46 45 4 42
Prices paid for raw materials
50 48 1 49
84 9 1 83
65 26 4 61
Capital expenditures 
37 50 11 26
38 44 14 24
New orders for exports
11 74 5 6
24 61 6 18
25 62 3 22
Supplier delivery time
11 84 2 9
27 63 5 22
11 80 5 6
Inventories:   
     Materials
26 53 18 8
39 35 24 15
25 47 24 1
     Finished goods
27 52 16 11
36 40 19 17
21 53 20 1


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The February survey included 104 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
 Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04Jul'04Aug'04Sep'04Oct'04Nov'04Dec'04Jan'05Feb'05
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production142728232620152020621832
Volume of shipments193736142514252334-11125
Volume of new orders529342023211519188-12226
Backlog of orders2102822413-673-3-798
Number of employees7151418161112132245-415
Average employee workweek61117151621176125-528
Prices received for finished product51728229161416159121820
Prices paid for raw materials38576756544752465343354649
Capital expendituresn/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a
New orders for exports059011-6035616
Supplier delivery time61527166161722131010149
Inventories:      Materials1131513-211311125-558
Inventories:      Finished goods3-61904116171-2711

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production27314335514650484144503743
Volume of shipments32344539464955514247534742
Volume of new orders38295245475152504244524545
Backlog of orders25213133283727312330293431
Number of employees12141919221525272528301815
Average employee workweek19162421373029282117232915
Prices received for finished product11193734344237384140405554
Prices paid for raw materials50648275718273727774768183
Capital expenditures9182222231716301921182026
New orders for exports71093258768121118
Supplier delivery time7202620223024352319182422
Inventories:      Materials365169617192018102515
Inventories:      Finished goods4-5-231-39131216152517

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production43404636484039393938414648
Volume of shipments42455335443640383543414450
Volume of new orders39364628473639383744434141
Backlog of orders2325261729169172026282418
Number of employees13192818161530232623211623
Average employee workweek107125131814886152110
Prices received for finished product25243928283120303036343642
Prices paid for raw materials48556557496155545959566061
Capital expenditures23223425231819252524202324
New orders for exports17151487514101313122322
Supplier delivery time51411131111414168596
Inventories:      Materials-6115-6-211-54-1-151
Inventories:      Finished goods-2-10-2-2209401-851



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page