News Release
Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri 64198
Phone (816) 881-2683
Fax (816) 881-2569


FOR RELEASE Tuesday, October 12, 2004
EMBARGOED FOR 11:00 A.M. EST
FOR RELEASE TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2004
EMBARGOED FOR 11 A.M. ET

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to expand strongly in September. Expectations for future factory activity were still very strong, and the future finished goods price index rose markedly after dropping in August.

A summary of the September survey is attached to this press release.

The Tenth Federal Reserve District encompasses Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

For more information about the monthly manufacturing survey, contact Chad Wilkerson, Economic Research Department, (816) 881-2869. The September manufacturing survey, as well as background information and results from past surveys, can be found on the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City's Web site, http:www.kansascityfed.org.

Survey of Tenth District Manufacturing
by Chad R. Wilkerson

Manufacturing activity in the Tenth Federal Reserve District continued to expand strongly in September. The year-over-year indexes for production, shipments, and new orders edged down but remained near all-time highs, and the capital spending index rose sharply. The year-over-year price indexes were virtually unchanged from last month and still quite high by historical standards. Expectations for future factory activity were still very strong, and the future finished goods price index rose markedly after dropping in August. Most month-over-month indexes increased, but the monthly data are not seasonally adjusted, so caution must be taken in basing analyses on month-to-month comparisons.

The net percentage of firms reporting year-over-year increases in production was 48 in September, down slightly from 50 in August but still near the all-time high of 51 reached in June (Tables 1 & 2). The slight easing in the production index was due to some slowdown in growth at nondurable goods-producing firms, as year-over-year output at durable goods-producing plants rose moderately in September. While sample sizes make it more difficult to draw firm conclusions about individual states, the data available suggest that production remained well above year-ago levels in all seven district states.

Most other year-over-year indexes of factory activity were similar to their strong August readings. Like the production index, the shipments and new orders indexes both eased slightly but remained near all-time highs. On the other hand, the employment index edged higher and capital spending index jumped from 16 to 30, its highest reading since the first time the Kansas City Fed survey was conducted in October 1994. The supplier delivery time index actually did reach a record high, and the inventory indexes—for both raw materials and finished goods—continued to move further into positive territory after posting negative readings through much of the 2000 to 2003 period.

The year-over-year price indexes were virtually unchanged in September after easing slightly in August from July’s record highs. The year-over-year raw materials price index was 72, while the finished goods price index was 38. The continued high level of the year-over-year finished goods index was due mainly to price increases for products with high steel or petroleum content.

Plant managers continued to be quite optimistic about future factory activity. The six-month-ahead production index was unchanged at 39, and the future shipments and new orders indexes eased only slightly. The future employment index experienced a somewhat larger drop-—-from 30 to 23—--but was still higher than in May, June, and July. Meanwhile, the future capital spending index rose from 19 to 25 after easing slightly in recent months. The gap between the future price indexes diminished somewhat. The future raw materials price index edged down from 55 to 54, but the future finished goods price index jumped from 20 to 30, erasing nearly all the drop in this index in August. Unlike the year-over-year finished goods price index, which is being held up by higher prices among producers of steel- and petroleum-based products, the future finished goods price index rose across virtually all industries in September.

Table1      
Summary of Tenth District Manufacturing Conditions, September 2004
  September vs. August
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
September vs. Year Ago
(percent)
Expected in Six Months
(percent, not seasonally adjusted)
Plant Level Indicators
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
Increase No
Change
Decrease Index*
 
Production
39 37 19 20
61 21 13 48
53 27 14 39
Volume of shipments
43 33 20 23
62 22 11 51
54 24 16 38
Volume of new orders
40 34 21 19
62 19 12 50
53 24 15 38
Backlog of orders
28 44 21 7
43 37 12 31
34 42 17 17
Number of employees
23 62 10 13
47 28 20 27
32 52 9 23
Average employee workweek
18 66 12 6
37 50 9 28
21 61 13 8
Prices received for finished product
21 68 5 16
50 31 12 38
41 41 11 30
Prices paid for raw materials
50 40 4 46
76 12 4 72
62 21 8 54
Capital expenditures 
39 45 9 30
30 56 5 25
New orders for exports
8 68 8 0
16 59 9 7
15 63 5 10
Supplier delivery time
25 67 3 22
41 47 6 35
19 71 5 14
Inventories:   
     Materials
31 45 20 11
41 31 22 19
20 49 25 -5
     Finished goods
23 54 17 6
31 44 18 13
22 48 18 4


* The diffusion index is calculated by subtracting the percentage of total respondents reporting decreases in a given indicator from the percentage of those reporting increases. Index values greater than zero generally suggest expansion, while values less than zero indicate contraction. When index values are closer to 100, the increases among respondents are more widespread. When index values are closer to -100, decreases are more widespread.
Note: The September survey included 132 responses from plants in Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, northern New Mexico, and western Missouri.

Table2
Historical Manufacturing Survey Indexes
 Sep'03Oct'03Nov'03Dec'03Jan'04Feb'04Mar'04Apr'04May'04Jun'04Jul'04Aug'04Sep'04
Versus a Month Ago
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production312861171427282326201520
Volume of shipments3021-117121937361425142523
Volume of new orders3129141921529342023211519
Backlog of orders258172102822413-67
Number of employees1148129715141816111213
Average employee workweek2558-4961117151621176
Prices received for finished product-1-5-23951728229161416
Prices paid for raw materials16172723393857675654475246
Capital expendituresn/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a
New orders for exports25-179059011-60
Supplier delivery time54810461527166161722
Inventories:      Materials-454-491131513-211311
Inventories:      Finished goods-812-3-63-61904116

Versus a Year Ago
 
Production17343135242731433551465048
Volume of shipments20362929273234453946495551
Volume of new orders31404145303829524547515250
Backlog of orders12102128222521313328372731
Number of employees-13-803-21214191922152527
Average employee workweek17171821201916242137302928
Prices received for finished product-1-14281119373434423738
Prices paid for raw materials30394049485064827571827372
Capital expenditures1231476918222223171630
New orders for exports05358710932587
Supplier delivery time3-4856720262022302435
Inventories:      Materials-7-5-89-536516961719
Inventories:      Finished goods-5-7-412-74-5-231-3913

Expected in Six Months
(not seasonally adjusted)
 
Production36554549334340463648403939
Volume of shipments38495045394245533544364038
Volume of new orders40504545383936462847363938
Backlog of orders2226122525232526172916917
Number of employees13152417121319281816153023
Average employee workweek131581991071251318148
Prices received for finished product1091417152524392828312030
Prices paid for raw materials29274035424855655749615554
Capital expenditures15161916162322342523181925
New orders for exports13111014171715148751410
Supplier delivery time8162351411131111414
Inventories:      Materials44-14-9-6115-6-211-5
Inventories:      Finished goods-6633-12-2-10-2-22094



Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
Manufacturing Survey Home Page