|
Research Working Paper |
|
|
|
Nested Forecast Model Comparisons: A New Approach to Testing Equal Accuracy By Todd E. Clark and Michael W.
McCracken
RWP 09-11 Abstract This
paper develops bootstrap methods for testing whether, in a finite
sample, competing out-of-sample forecasts from nested models are equally
accurate. Most prior work on forecast tests for nested models has
focused on a null hypothesis of equal accuracy in population
― basically, whether coefficients on the extra variables in the larger,
nesting model are zero. We instead use an asymptotic approximation that
treats the coefficients as non-zero but small, such that, in a finite
sample, forecasts from the small model are expected to be as accurate as
forecasts from the large model. Under that approximation, we derive the
limiting distributions of pairwise tests of equal mean square error, and
develop bootstrap methods for estimating critical values. Monte Carlo
experiments show that our proposed procedures have good size and power
properties for the null of equal finite-sample forecast accuracy. We
illustrate the use of the procedures with applications to forecasting
stock returns and inflation. |